5 thoughts on “From the scientific perspective, is pet a threat to new crown epidemic prevention?”
Bobbie
Pets are not a threat to new crown epidemic prevention. At present, from a large number of studies, the new crown pneumonia infection of pets is more from the positive owner. That is, in the conveying chain of people, pets are risk of being infected, not pets threatened people. For example, a study in the UK analyzed the blood-free pneumonia antibody of pets, cats and dogs from April to May and September to February 2021 to track the infection. As a result, no new epidemic sample was found in the new epidemic sample, and the dogs with only 1.4%of the second epidemic and 2.2%of cats appeared new crown pneumonia antibodies, and there was a history of infection. This shows that pets are not the poison storage of new coronary pneumonia virus, and their overall impact on the epidemic is limited. Is pets a threat to new crown epidemic prevention? The risk of human pets infected with new coronary pneumonia virus is very low, but positive pets are facing a lot of risk of infection. But so far, there are no reports from cats from cats to dogs from cats. Considering that most pets have milder symptoms after infection, and the virus falls off for a short time, even in countries with severe episodes, pets infected with new crown pneumonia accounted for only a small part of all pets in the society. Therefore, pets are not the main threat of the epidemic. So is it necessary to kill these pets? Experts pointed out that "pets infected with new crown pneumonia virus have not passed the virus back to people so far, and the virus has a barrier that cannot be leaned casually." Besides, they are also living lives. We don't want to see pets who are killed for no reason. You may not like pets, but don't hurt them. Because the appearance of pets makes people gentle, their companionship soothe the hearts of countless travelers and warms the elderly, children and depression patients who live alone. Some people say, "I raised him in material, but it was mentally cured." "Sometimes I feel that I need it, not it needs us." This is a long process of growing up, mutual dependence, and mutual companionship. In the process, these pets have become our friends and family.
I personally think that pets are indeed a threat to the new crown epidemic prevention, because pets do not understand human words, and can not go to isolate to treat them well in accordance with human instructions. big.
I think so, because the new coronal virus can also be transmitted to pets, and our pets will come into contact with many different people every day. They may carry the virus to the owner, so we must also pay attention to pets.
From a scientific perspective, pets are not dangerous for new crown epidemic prevention, because there is no evidence that dogs can spread the new crown virus to humans. If it causes danger, it is also because the owner threatens pets.
I think it is to a certain extent, because pets carrying new coronal viruses will have a very adverse effect on the prevention and control of the epidemic.
Pets are not a threat to new crown epidemic prevention.
At present, from a large number of studies, the new crown pneumonia infection of pets is more from the positive owner. That is, in the conveying chain of people, pets are risk of being infected, not pets threatened people. For example, a study in the UK analyzed the blood-free pneumonia antibody of pets, cats and dogs from April to May and September to February 2021 to track the infection. As a result, no new epidemic sample was found in the new epidemic sample, and the dogs with only 1.4%of the second epidemic and 2.2%of cats appeared new crown pneumonia antibodies, and there was a history of infection. This shows that pets are not the poison storage of new coronary pneumonia virus, and their overall impact on the epidemic is limited.
Is pets a threat to new crown epidemic prevention? The risk of human pets infected with new coronary pneumonia virus is very low, but positive pets are facing a lot of risk of infection. But so far, there are no reports from cats from cats to dogs from cats. Considering that most pets have milder symptoms after infection, and the virus falls off for a short time, even in countries with severe episodes, pets infected with new crown pneumonia accounted for only a small part of all pets in the society. Therefore, pets are not the main threat of the epidemic.
So is it necessary to kill these pets? Experts pointed out that "pets infected with new crown pneumonia virus have not passed the virus back to people so far, and the virus has a barrier that cannot be leaned casually." Besides, they are also living lives. We don't want to see pets who are killed for no reason. You may not like pets, but don't hurt them. Because the appearance of pets makes people gentle, their companionship soothe the hearts of countless travelers and warms the elderly, children and depression patients who live alone. Some people say, "I raised him in material, but it was mentally cured." "Sometimes I feel that I need it, not it needs us." This is a long process of growing up, mutual dependence, and mutual companionship. In the process, these pets have become our friends and family.
I personally think that pets are indeed a threat to the new crown epidemic prevention, because pets do not understand human words, and can not go to isolate to treat them well in accordance with human instructions. big.
I think so, because the new coronal virus can also be transmitted to pets, and our pets will come into contact with many different people every day. They may carry the virus to the owner, so we must also pay attention to pets.
From a scientific perspective, pets are not dangerous for new crown epidemic prevention, because there is no evidence that dogs can spread the new crown virus to humans. If it causes danger, it is also because the owner threatens pets.
I think it is to a certain extent, because pets carrying new coronal viruses will have a very adverse effect on the prevention and control of the epidemic.